<< Back to Current Issue

Click here to download electronic copy

CEHTP HOME >>

California Tracking

No. 10  summer  2005

The Newsletter of the California Environmental Health Tracking Program

In This Issue

CEHTP is conducting several pilot projects that serve as "road tests" for elements of an environmental health tracking system. These projects allow us to go through key steps with the advice and guidance of community and governmental stakeholders.

The Alameda County Pilot Project is focusing on asthma, preterm birth, term low birthweight, and traffic pollution. This issue presents a few examples of preliminary findings related to birth outcomes and asthma.

The findings are helping us to understand the distribution of health conditions and health disparities and are proving to be valuable to a wide range of stakeholders.

The final results will increase the scientific body of knowledge around environmental health issues. Furthermore, the methods utilized, technologies developed, lessons learned, and relationships formed will foster the development of a future, statewide environmental health tracking system.


Alameda County Pilot Project

Understanding Birth Outcome Distribution

Multiple Asthma Indicators

Economic Burden of Asthma

Collaborating with Stakeholders

Central Valley/South Coast Pilot Project


Setting the Stage for a Statewide System :: the Alameda County Pilot Project

The goals of the Alameda County Pilot Project (ACPP) are to: 1) identify communities with elevated risk for asthma, preterm birth, or term low birthweight and assess their exposure to traffic pollution in Alameda County; 2) improve our ability to examine possible connections between asthma, preterm birth, and term low birthweight with exposure to pollution caused by automobile and truck traffic; 3) explore various methods of measuring and visualizing asthma occurrence in populations; and 4) assess the benefits, limitations, and costs of this type of tracking system and explore how these approaches may be applied to other health conditions and environmental hazards in California.

The ACPP has begun to demonstrate how utilization of existing data can contribute to public knowledge while maintaining data confidentiality. Key processes that have contributed to early successes include:

Working with a knowledgeable, diverse advisory group (comprised of community and governmental experts) that guides the development and dissemination of ACPP materials.

Partnering with public (e.g. Medi-Cal and the California Center for Health Statistics) and private (e.g. Kaiser Permanente of Northern California) data providers.

Developing standards and tools to support accurate and complete analysis and geocoding of data.

 


Applying New Methods to Existing Data :: Better Understanding Birth Outcomes Distribution

In some cases, the data available for environmental health tracking are very complete but there have been limitations in the analysis, visualization, and communication of the data. In the ACPP, we are applying various new methods to improve the analysis and utility of birth outcomes data. Figure 1, a smoothed-surface (density estimation) map of preterm birth rates provides a much more accurate picture of the distribution of this adverse birth outcome than a traditional, zip code method (Figure 2) of looking at population health. Benefits of these methods and results include:

Artificial boundaries (such as zip codes) no longer limit or influence the analysis and visualization of data;

Accuracy and resolution of the information are increased (neighborhood-level "hot spots" and variations are identified);

More accurate analyses of disparities by geography, race/ethnicity, and income are made possible;

There is less misleading information (areas without people are no longer assigned rates); and

Confidentiality/privacy is preserved.

 


Improving our Understanding of Asthma in a Population :: Analysis and Application of Multiple Asthma Indicators

Indicators are used to identify, describe, and communicate the condition of a population. There are various asthma indicators that can be used to describe the asthma status of populations. Because a population's asthma status will look different depending on the indicator, using a single indicator for asthma can results in incomplete and/or misleading descriptions.

A common method of characterizing asthma in California is through hospital discharge data. While useful, these data can only provide zip code-level rates and are limited to asthma-related hospitalizations. In order to better understand and describe asthma, especially at a small-scale level, we need to examine other asthma-related events (e.g. emergency room visits, outpatient visits, and medication purchases).

To that end, ACPP collaborated with public and private partners (Medi-Cal and Kaiser Permanente of Northern California) to obtain street address-level patient data needed to develop various asthma indicators, including rates of:

Emergency room visits;

Outpatient visits;

Symptom medication purchases; and

Maintenance medication purchases.

Using similar statistical and GIS (Geographic Information Systems) techniques used to produce the birth outcomes results (article above), we created smoothed-surface maps for each of the asthma indicators. Figures 3 and 4 represent maps for rates of emergency room visits and maintenance medication purchases. As evidenced by those figures, the asthma status in Alameda County looks very different depending on which indicator is being used.

We can now see that the different asthma events are not equally distributed. Table 1 clearly illustrates an inverse relationship between emergency room visits and purchase of maintenance medications.

The findings speak to the fact that people experience asthma in different ways and that the different events represent a range of asthma severity. By comparing maps based on various asthma indicators, we can identify communities that are likely experiencing more severe asthma (e.g. higher rates of emergency room visits) and communities with relatively high but well maintained asthma (e.g. higher rates of medication purchases).

We are also able to more accurately analyze disparities by geography and socioeconomic status. For example, we have found that communities with higher poverty rates have significantly higher rates of emergency room visits while having disproportionately lower rates of maintenance medications purchases.

The findings also help to generate questions around factors that contribute to the disparate ways that communities experience asthma (e.g. air quality, housing conditions, quality of/access to health care, and other community factors).

In summary, asthma indicators developed using high-quality data, amenable to high-resolution geographical analysis, can more accurately describe and communicate a population's asthma status while preserving privacy and confidentiality.

 


Information to Support Public Policy and Interventions :: Disparate Economic Burden of Asthma

Due to rising asthma spending and the need to define health status in economic terms, we have developed an indicator that puts asthma information in the context of economic costs to society. In order to develop such an indicator we obtained average costs* for each of the asthma-related health events (Table 2). Immediately apparent is the enormous difference in costs along a range of asthma events.

In order to describe the distribution of asthma costs in Alameda County, we applied methods which combine the cost data with our previous analyses of asthma data (article above). For any given location in Alameda County, we can calculate a rate for hospitalizations, emergency room visits, outpatient visits, and medication purchases. We multiply each of these rates by the respective costs; add the results; and divide that sum by the number of children (0-17yrs) in the county to create a total cost per capita map (Figure 5).

This map demonstrates another approach to understanding and describing the conditions in a population. This type of information can support decisions based on both health and economic data. It can also be useful in targeting resources/ services such as primary and secondary prevention. For example, Figure 5 identifies areas with potential to avoid high costs by addressing health care inequities. In developing and disseminating this type of information, we hope to increase the utility of environmental health tracking information for a broad range of stakeholders.

* Data Source:

Cost estimates for Asthma-related events are from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), which provides information about health care use and costs in the United States. For more information about MEPS, visit: www.meps.ahrq.gov

Limitations:

Estimates from MEPS are not specific to Alameda County, but are averages for the US. For some estimates, the MEPS methods (for example: how asthma is defined) can be different from our methods. Also, our rates of asthma-related events were calculated from a non-representative sample.

Therefore, the confidence intervals on these cost estimates are rather large and the absolute numbers shown on the map are likely to be off. However, the variations across the map are likely to be real.

 


Keys to Success :: Collaborating with Stakeholders to Develop Meaningful and Relevant Information

The ACPP findings speak to the benefits of a participatory process in which stakeholders define issues and influence solutions that are useful and relevant to their needs and concerns. Thanks to the guidance of the ACPP Advisory Group (community and governmental stakeholders), we have been able to produce results that could have tremendous implications for policy-makers, public health officials, and community-based organizations. Various stakeholders have confirmed that the findings can be used to:

Inform the allocation of various resources, funding, and services;

Guide the development of public policy and public health programs;

Evaluate the effect of policies and public health programs;

Confirm and complement community-based knowledge;

Present objective, scientifically-based information that is useful for planning and decision-making;

Identify communities disproportionately burdened by diseases;

Conduct targeted outreach and education; and

Garner support/funding for issues and projects;

The ACPP Advisory Group is working to ensure that the findings get to appropriate stakeholders in appropriate formats and methods by guiding the outreach and dissemination strategy that will be based on overall project findings.

 


Tracking Children's Environmental Health :: the Central Valley/South Coast Pilot Project

This, our other pilot project, focuses on counties in the Sacramento Valley, San Joaquin Valley, and South Coast air basins. We are exploring geographic variations in health outcomes and their possible relationships with environmental hazards, using data on: preterm birth and term low birthweight events; SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome); Autism Spectrum Disorders; mental retardation; airborne hazards (pesticide use and toxic air pollutants); and maternal and child blood lead levels. The goals of the Central Valley/South Coast Pilot Project are to:

Demonstrate the feasibility of tracking airborne hazards, lead exposure, and health outcomes.

Increase capacity to examine possible connections between airborne hazards and lead with health outcomes of infancy and childhood.

Create materials that can be used for education, outreach, planning, and public health action.

Provide communities with new information to address health concerns regarding air toxics and pesticide exposures.

Although this pilot project differs in geographic scope and several health and environmental topics, the processes are similar to those of the ACPP. For more information about this pilot project, please visit www.catracking.com/sub/p2.htm or contact the project's Principal Investigator, Eric Roberts, MD, PHD at erobert1@dhs.ca.gov.

Disclaimer: Links to non-CEHTP resources are provided solely as a service.  These links do not constitute an endorsement of these resources and none should be inferred.  CEHTP is not responsible for the content of the individual organization Web pages or documents found at these links.